For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.
Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.
It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wants to broaden his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.
It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.
"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.
"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it fairly and fairly."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, oke.zone a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the vague pledge of development."
A government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them certify their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."
Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.
The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.
If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.
As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, wiki.cemu.info and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.
But given how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives
Bennett Ashkanasy edited this page 9 months ago